Writing DI’s debate article this morning, Lars O Grönstedt, advisor to the Nord Steam company comments on the debate in Sweden in the past week not to allow the company to use the port of Slite on Gotland as a base to store pipes for a proposed gas pipeline, Nord Stream 2.
The debate has shown that those who make the most blatant claims are those who are the least well-informed, he writes, listing the twelve claims that are being aired in the debate, including the one that the EU can decide whether the pipeline should be built or not. Grönstedt points out that such a decision is outside the EU’s sphere of influence and that permission is given by each country pursuant to the act on the continental shelf.
Furthermore, despite claims that the pipes may be fitted with signals intelligence solutions, no one has been able to say how such intelligence will be gathered. It is a well-known fact that radio signals travel at a much slower speed under water, which radically reduces the amount of data. There are far simpler methods available, if a foreign power wishes to monitor shipping in the Baltic, he points out.
Grönstedt concludes that Nord Stream should be invited to the talks the MFA and the Ministry of Defence intends to hold with the pertinent municipalities on 13 December, since the claims being made are based on “untruths”.